Етапи моніторингу організації виховної роботи у вищому навчальному закладі
Вантажиться...
Дата
2014
Автори
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Анотація
У статті розкривається сутність поняття педагогічного моніторингу та моніторингу організації виховної роботи у вищому навчальному закладі. Характеризується поетапність моніторингу організації виховної роботи у вищому навчальному закладі як одна з особливостей його реалізації. Аналізуються три етапи моніторингу організації виховної роботи: підготовчий, практичний та аналітичний. Наголошується на цілісності моніторингу організації виховної роботи у вищому навчальному закладі, а відтак, на взаємозалежності визначених етапів.
The article describes the experimental aspects of the definition of monitoring level in the organization of educational work in higher educational institution. The author proposes a number of criteria on the basis of the structure in the organization of educational work in higher educational institution and monitoring requirements: motivational, cognitive, practical, effective, corrective and respectively their indicators. The indicators of motivation criterion in research of a monitoring level in organization of educational work are defined: the awareness by the subjects of the educational work of the need to conduct such monitoring as a means of optimization of educational work (deep, situational, superficial, unconscious); motivation monitoring (clearly defined, situational, missing); motivation of professional activity (internal, active; internal; passive foreign missing). The indicators of cognitive criteria are: ownership of the monitoring concepts (deeply conscious, reproductive, superficial, partial or non partial); mastering the methods of monitoring research (creative, reproductive, situational, dogmatic or missing); monitoring of knowledge (profound, reproductive, fragmentary, elementary). The indicators of the practical criteria are the following: determination of the aim and objectives of monitoring (clear, situational, fragmentary, and superficial); implementing adequate specific purpose of monitoring methods (creative, reproductive, fragmentary and dogmatic; substantiation of conceptual and procedural aspects of the monitoring system, adequate, superficial, incomplete or missing); reporting (system-structured, structured superficial, primitive). The indicators of effective criteria are defined: the analysis of documents (plans, programs, reports, concepts) (statement of purpose, concreteness, executors, terms, principles, consistency, accounting of interests of the subjects of educational work; information on the execution of decisions, the content, forms and methods of organization of educational work)(system, sufficient surface, primitive); activity of subjects in educational work (participation in events, responsibility, initiative, creativity) (high, enough, low); the activities of students’ bodies self-government (creativity, activity, social orientation) (creative, episodic, passive); personal growth of students (social values, objective self-esteem, creativity, motivation of the professional activity, communicative and organizational skills, ability to self-regulation and self-actualization) (high, enough, medium, and low levels in accordance with diagnostics). Indicators of corrective criteria are: changes in the planning system-grounded, well-reasoned, superficial, and missing); the modification of the contents of educational work (creative, reproductive, fragmented, missing); recommendations on the use of methods and forms of educational work (justified, reasonable, superficial, and lacking); modelling of the updated structure of organization of educational work (system-grounded, well-reasoned, schematic and missing).
The article describes the experimental aspects of the definition of monitoring level in the organization of educational work in higher educational institution. The author proposes a number of criteria on the basis of the structure in the organization of educational work in higher educational institution and monitoring requirements: motivational, cognitive, practical, effective, corrective and respectively their indicators. The indicators of motivation criterion in research of a monitoring level in organization of educational work are defined: the awareness by the subjects of the educational work of the need to conduct such monitoring as a means of optimization of educational work (deep, situational, superficial, unconscious); motivation monitoring (clearly defined, situational, missing); motivation of professional activity (internal, active; internal; passive foreign missing). The indicators of cognitive criteria are: ownership of the monitoring concepts (deeply conscious, reproductive, superficial, partial or non partial); mastering the methods of monitoring research (creative, reproductive, situational, dogmatic or missing); monitoring of knowledge (profound, reproductive, fragmentary, elementary). The indicators of the practical criteria are the following: determination of the aim and objectives of monitoring (clear, situational, fragmentary, and superficial); implementing adequate specific purpose of monitoring methods (creative, reproductive, fragmentary and dogmatic; substantiation of conceptual and procedural aspects of the monitoring system, adequate, superficial, incomplete or missing); reporting (system-structured, structured superficial, primitive). The indicators of effective criteria are defined: the analysis of documents (plans, programs, reports, concepts) (statement of purpose, concreteness, executors, terms, principles, consistency, accounting of interests of the subjects of educational work; information on the execution of decisions, the content, forms and methods of organization of educational work)(system, sufficient surface, primitive); activity of subjects in educational work (participation in events, responsibility, initiative, creativity) (high, enough, low); the activities of students’ bodies self-government (creativity, activity, social orientation) (creative, episodic, passive); personal growth of students (social values, objective self-esteem, creativity, motivation of the professional activity, communicative and organizational skills, ability to self-regulation and self-actualization) (high, enough, medium, and low levels in accordance with diagnostics). Indicators of corrective criteria are: changes in the planning system-grounded, well-reasoned, superficial, and missing); the modification of the contents of educational work (creative, reproductive, fragmented, missing); recommendations on the use of methods and forms of educational work (justified, reasonable, superficial, and lacking); modelling of the updated structure of organization of educational work (system-grounded, well-reasoned, schematic and missing).
Опис
Ключові слова
моніторинг, педагогічний моніторинг, моніторинг організації виховної роботи, етапи моніторингу організації виховної роботи, вищий навчальний заклад, monitoring, pedagogical monitoring, monitoring of the organization in educational work, criterion, indicator of the criterion, level of monitoring
Бібліографічний опис
Дурманенко, О. Л. Етапи моніторингу організації виховної роботи у вищому навчальному закладі [Текст] / О. Л. Дурманенко // Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології : науковий журнал / МОН України, Сумський держ. пед. ун-т ім. А. С. Макаренка ; [редкол.: А. А. Сбруєва, О. Є. Антонова, Дж. Бішоп та ін.]. – Суми : СумДПУ ім. А. С. Макаренка, 2014. – № 1 (35). – С. 318–325.