Запрошуємо до репозитарію відкритого доступу Сумського державного педагогічного університету імені А. С. Макаренка (eSSPUIR)!
eSSPUIR - Електронний інституційний репозитарій Сумського державного педагогічного університету імені А.С. Макаренка
ISSN 2522-1531
eSSPUIR – електронний архів наукових та освітніх матеріалів СумДПУ імені А. С. Макаренка, що забезпечує накопичення, систематизацію, зберігання інтелектуальних продуктів наукового, освітнього та методичного призначення, створених університетськими спільнотами Сумського державного педагогічного університету імені А. С. Макаренка, та забезпечує довготривалий, постійний і надійний безкоштовний відкритий доступ до них засобами Інтернет-сервісів, поширення цих матеріалів у середовищі світового науково-освітнього товариства.
Кількість документів: 16484. Останнє оновлення: 17.09.2025.
Для створення, накопичення й редагування власних колекцій звертайтеся до
адміністратора архіву.
Фонди
Виберіть фонд, щоб переглянути його зібрання.
Нові надходження
Analysis of the Activities of the Vice-Rectors of the Hlukhiv Pedagogical Institute Under the Rectorships of Mykola Velikolug and Leonid Gnatyuk
(Гельветика, 2025) Valiukh Oleksandr; Валюх Олександр
The purpose of the article is to analyze the activities of the vice-rectors of the Hlukhiv Pedagogical Institute during the rectorships of Mykola Velykuluh (1980-1985) and Leonid Hnatyuk (1985-1990) and to create a prosopographic portrait of the leadership of the higher education institution. The basis of the source base of the article was the personal files of the vice-rectors, which are stored in the Departmental Archive of the Oleksandr Dovzhenko Hlukhiv National Pedagogical University. To implement the purpose of the study, we used biographical, chronological methods, and the general scientific method of system analysis. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the results of the created collective portrait of the rectors and vice-rectors of the Hlukhiv State Pedagogical Institute named after S. M. Sergeev-Tsensky Mykola Velykuluh and Leonid Hnatyuk, who worked alternately during the 1980s, have been introduced into scientific circulation. In the course of our research, we determined that thereis a continuity in their activities. This indicates the acquisition of experience and professional competence. That is, during the tenure of the rector L. Hnatyuk, the vice-rectorate was more stable. For the above reasons, the average age of vice-rectors at this time was also higher: 43.8years versus 40.2 years. Also, the indicator of highly qualified personnel in general in the period 1985-1990 was higher, as 80% versus 25%. In addition, the gender ratio was in favor of women during the rectorship of L.Hnatyuk. Conclusions. Thus, the comparative analysis conducted by us in this study and the created prosopographical and professional portrait of the vice-rectors of the Glukhiv State Pedagogical Institute helped us to better identify the features of the development of the higher education institution during the tenures of M.Velykoluh and L.Hnatyuk in the adjacent historical periods of the 1980s.
«Polish Road to Freedom”: the Fate of Revolutionary Viktor Boleslawovych Arendt (1843-1927)
(2025) Cherkasov Oleksandr Oleksandrovych; Черкасов Олександр Олександрович; Bilichenko Lidiia; Біліченко Лідія
The article is devoted to the study of the life path of the Polish revolutionary Viktor Bolesławowicz Arendt (1943-1927). The aim of the work is a comprehensive study of the life path of the Polish-Ukrainian revolutionary Viktor Boleslavovich Arendt. To solve this problem, classical methods of historical science were applied – the principles of historicism, dialectics, systematics, which make it possible to study phenomena in the process of formation, formation and development, in an organic connection with the conditions that gave rise to them, the spirit of the time. The study is conducted taking into account the unity of internal and external, subjective and objective factors of the historical process. Conclusions are drawn based on the analysis of the entire complex of sources used, taking into account existing scientific and research traditions. Scientific novelty. The study is the first attempt at a comprehensive analysis of archival sources that reflect the revolutionary, scientific-historical, and legal activities of Victor Arendt. Conclusions. The research revealed that Victor Arendt was born on January12, 1843 in Kyiv and came from a Polish family. After graduating from the Vilnius Classical Gymnasium in 1859, he volunteered for Italy in the army of Giuseppe Garibaldi, to defend the oppressed people from the Papal authority and Austrian occupation. Upon returning home in 1860, he entered the Krakow-Jagiellonian Academy, at the Faculty of History and Philology, which he graduated in 1863. On January22, 1863, the Polish Revolutionary Foundation in Warsaw declared a general Polish uprising against the imperial government. Victor Arendt, as an ethnic Pole, immediately appeared at the Foundation and was accepted as an assistant secretary. It has been established that after the suppression of the Polish uprising by Russian troops, in March 1864, Victor Arendt was convicted and arrived to serve his sentence in Vologda prison. After the amnesty of 1867, he went to Paris, where he took part in the uprising of the Paris Commune. After returning to the Russian Empire, Victor Arendt took part in the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-1878. In 1907, he entered the Moscow Archaeological Institute as a student, which he graduated with honors in 1909. Later, he was electedan honorary member of the institute and defended his thesis there on the topic: “Prehistoric monuments of the Western Royal Prussians” and received the title of “scientific archaeologist”. In 1909, Victor Arendt decided to become a lawyer and graduated from Moscow University. During 1914-1918, he participated in the First World War. In 1918, during the change of power in Ukraine, Symon Petliura appointed Viktor Arendt as an investigator for important cases in the UNR Directory. In 1918, when the vanguard of the Bolshevik army entered Kyiv, Symon Petliura’s troops retreated and left Kyiv. In their absence, Arendt, Cherkeza, and Ananyev released the Bolsheviks from prisons. Upon Petliura’s return to Kyiv, Viktor Arendt was arrested and thrown into prison. He was released after the establishment of Bolshevik power. In 1918-1919, Viktor Arendt was the inspector of forests of the Kyiv province and conducted inspections in the counties. However, falling ill, he was forced to leave for Crimea, where he was appointed forester of the Alupka Forest. In February 1921 Arendt left for Smolensk on assignment to the position of Smolensk provincial forest inspector, where in 1922 he was appointed investigator for important cases, and in 1923 to the position of investigator of the Western District Military Transport Tribunal. In 1924, Victor Arendtretired from service due to health reasons and was enrolled in the section of scientific workers. Twenty of his scientific works were translated into foreign languages, and the Paris Academy of Sciences elected him as its member. In 1927, Victor Arendt’s health deteriorated significantly. In this regard, as a native of Kyiv, he was sent to the Odessa House of Revolutionary Veterans. 1927 was the last year of Victor Arendt’s life.
Turkic Tribes in the Caucasus During the Early Middle Ages
(2025) Huseinova Irada Mekhdihulu kyzy; Гусейнова Ірада Мехдігулу кизи; Терігеле Чжан; Terihele Chzhan
The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive examination of the ethno-political processes that occurred in the Caucasus during the early medieval period, with particular emphasis on the role of Turkic tribes–such as the Huns, Khazars, Savirs, Bulgars, and others–in transforming the historical and cultural landscape of the region. The article is aimed at identifying patterns of interaction between nomadic tribes, and settled peoples of Transcaucasia, their influence on political structures, religious systems and the ethnic picture of the Caucasus. It traces the dynamics of migrations, military campaigns and diplomatic missions of Turkic-speaking peoples in the context of the broader geopolitical struggle between Byzantium, the Caliphate and the steppe powers.The scientific novelty of the work lies in the multidimensional approach to the analysis of ethnic, and political changes in the Caucasus, realized through the synthesis of written sources (including Byzantine chronicles, Arabic treatises, Chinese chronicles) and archaeological data, as well as reliance on the latest research in the field of historical anthropology and ethnography. Forthe first time, the author introduces into scholarly circulation a set of data derived from Chinese chronicles of the Han and Tang dynasties, which makes it possible to broaden the understanding of the international relations of the Turkic tribes. The chronology of the Khazar-Arab clashes is also clarified, and the little-studied aspects of the cultural adaptation of the Turks in the conditions ofthe border region characterized by a high degree of ethno-confessional diversity are considered.In conclusion, it is emphasized that Turkic tribes, who acted in the Caucasus not only as conquerors but also as intermediaries between different cultures, had a significant impact on the development of political institutions, the transformation of the ethno-religious landscape and the formation of a unique Caucasian model of coexistence. Their participation in the historical processes of the 6th-8thcenturies was a factor of profound changes reflected in the stable political and cultural ties between the Eurasian Steppe and the South Caucasus. The findings broaden the horizons of research on the early medieval history of Eurasia and emphasize the importance of the Caucasus as a strategic crossroads of civilizations.
Archaeological Research in Gorodsk (1930-50s)
(2025) Khadadova Maryna Volodymyrivna; Хададова Марина Володимирівна
The article highlights the history of archaeological research of the multi-layered settlement of Gorodsk, an eponymous monument of the late Trypillian culture and a monument of the Ansient Rus period during the 1930s-50s.The purpose of the article: to highlight the stages of archaeological study of Gorodsk during the 1930s-50s.The methodological basis of the study is the principle of scientificity and systematicity, methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization.Scientific novelty: for the first time, information on the study of archaeological monuments of Gorodsk during the 1930s-1950s.And the modern study of materials from the monument were analyzed and systematized. Conclusions. Archaeological study of monuments on the territory of the village of Gorodske began at the end of the 19th century, but large-scale archaeological research was first carried out in 1936, when employees of the Polissya Historical and Technical Expedition of the Institute of Mines and Mineralogy of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR conducted reconnaissance excavations at all three hillforts. During the reconnaissance excavations of 1936, chronicle information about the destruction of the hillfort by Prince Danylo Galicia was confirmed, in particular due to the presence of human skeletons in the burnt cages. At the second hillfort, Chervona Gora, the remains of an Eneolithic settlement were found, which became the first known Late Trypillian settlement located on the banks of the Teteriv River. Further research allowed us to trace the layout of the settlement, two types of housing construction, and study its material culture. Later, the Gorodske Late Trypillian settlement became an eponymous monument that illustrated certain local features and was considered by researchers as the final stage of the existence of the Trypillian culture. The study of the Ansient Rus stage of the monument’s functioning continued in 1940. Excavations were mainly carried out at the so-called Small settlement, which was finally fully explored in 1958. According to researchers, the Small settlement was a separate fortified part of the chronicle city where artisans lived. In the subsequent period, as a result of the study of excavation materials, in particular ceramics, two cultural and chronological horizons were distinguished –Ancient Rus and post-Horde. This indicated that life on the settlement did not completely cease after 1257.
Мета статті. У статті висвітлюється історія археологічних досліджень багатошарового городища Городська, епонімної пам’ятки пізньотрипільської культури та пам’ятки давньоруського часу протягом 30-50-хрр. 20ст. висвітлити етапи археологічного вивчення Городська протягом 30-50-хрр. 20ст. Методологічною основою дослідження виступають принцип науковості та системності, методи аналізу, синтезу, узагальнення. Наукова новизна: вперше проаналізовано та систематизовано інформацію про дослідження археологічних пам’яток Городска протягом 30-50-хрр. 20ст. та сучасне вивчення матеріалів з пам’ятки. Висновки. Археологічне вивчення пам’яток на території с.Городське розпочалось ще в кінці 19ст., але масштабні археологічні дослідження вперше були проведені в 1936р., коли співробітники Поліської історико-технічної експедиції ІІМК АН УРСР провели розвідкові розкопки на всіх трьох городищах. В ході розвідкових розкопок 1936р. були підтверджені літописні відомості про знищення городища князем Данилом Галицьким, зокрема через наявність в обгорілих клітях людських кістяків. На другому городищі Червона Гора були знайдені рештки поселення енеолітичного часу, яке стає першим відомим пізньотрипільським поселенням, розташованим на берегах р.Тетерів. Подальші дослідження дозволили простежити планування поселення, два види житлобудування, вивчити його матеріальну культуру. В подальшому городське пізньотрипільське поселення стає епонімною пам’яткою, що ілюструвала певні локальні особливості і розглядалась дослідниками як завершальна стадія існування трипільської культури. Вивчення давньоруського етапу функціонування пам’ятки продовжилось в 1940р. Розкопки переважно проводились на так званому Малому городищі, яке, в результаті було повністю досліджене в 1958р. На думку дослідників, Мале городище було окремою укріпленою частиною літописного міста де проживали ремісники. В подальший період у результаті вивчення матеріалів з розкопок, зокрема кераміки, були виділені два культурно-хронологічні горизонти – давньоруський і післяординський. Це свідчило про те, що життя на городищі після 1257р. не припинилося повністю.
The Newspaper «Dilo» as a Source for Studying the Parliamentary Activity of Andrii Kosa
(2025) Кліш Андрій Богданович; Klish Andrii Bohdanovych; Zuliak Ivan Stepanovych; Зуляк Іван Степанович
The purpose of the research is to analyze the Ukrainian daily newspaper Dilo as a source for researching the parliamentary activity of Andrii Kos – one of the leading Ukrainian deputies to the Imperial Council of Austria-Hungary at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. The focus is on identifying the role of the publication in informing the public about the activities of Ukrainian parliamentarians, particularly Kos, as well as reconstructing his political stance through journalistic, analytical, and stenographic materials.The research methodologyis grounded in the principles of historicism, narrative analysis, and source criticism. The primary source base consists of «Dilo» publications from 1897 to 1903, which recorded Kos’s speeches, parliamentary inquiries, commentaries, and interpretations of his work. The study employs content analysis of parliamentary materials and thematic classification of Kos’s statements regarding pressing social, national, and legal issues. Additional archival sources, memoirs, and historiographical literature are used to critically cross-reference the data.The scientific novelty.For the first time in Ukrainian historiography, Dilo is analyzed as a coherent and systematic body of sources for reconstructing the political portrait of a specific Ukrainian parliamentarian within the Austro-Hungarian legislative system. The study identifies the specifics of how information was presented in the newspaper, the editorial board’s ideological stance on Kos’s key political initiatives, and the role of the press as an instrument for shaping public opinion and political culture in Halychyna.Conclusions. The «Dilo» newspaper emerges not only as a source of factual information but also as an active participant in the political process – a voice of the national-democratic wing of the Ukrainian movement in Austria-Hungary. Its publications allow for the reconstruction of both the substantive aspects of Andrii Kos’s parliamentary activity and the mechanisms of political communication between the deputy and the electorate. The analysis highlights key themes of his work, such as the defense of the Ukrainian language in the judiciary, criticism of fiscal policies affecting the peasantry, opposition to censorship, and advocacy against the feudal-era propinacja system. In public discourse, Andrii Kos appears both as a representative of socially marginalized groups and as an advocate for broader national emancipation of Ukrainians within the multiethnic empire. The results of this study may be useful for further research on the role of the press as a source of political history, as well as in developing topics related to the history of parliamentarianism and national representation of Ukrainians in the 19th and 20thcenturies.