Менеджмент ризиків у вищій освіті: характеристика понятійно-термінологічного апарату дослідження
Вантажиться...
Дата
2014
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
СумДПУ імені А. С. Макаренка
Анотація
У статті схарактеризовано й обґрунтовано понятійно-термінологічний апарат дослідження менеджменту ризиків у вищій освіті на основі застосування таких теоретичних методів, як метод термінологічного аналізу, порівняння, синтез, узагальнення. Здійснено порівняльний аналіз таких категорій, як «ризик», «ризик-менеджмент», «управління ризиками», «профіль ризику», «власник ризику» на основі вітчизняних та зарубіжних фахових джерел, тлумачних і спеціалізованих словників, нормативних документів Великої Британії в галузі менеджменту ризиків. Робиться спроба уточнення єдиної термінології педагогічної ризикології, що сприятиме підвищенню рівня оволодіння нею співробітниками та адміністрацією вищих навчальних закладів. Подальшого вивчення потребує аналіз провідних концепцій менеджменту ризиків у вітчизняній та зарубіжній теорії освіти.
The process of higher education modernization gives rise to a great deal of risks the higher education institutions face. This risk management policy forms part of the internal control and corporate governance arrangements of the UK universities which try to follow and adopt best practice in the identification, evaluation and control of risks to ensure that, as far as is reasonably practical, risks are eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level. Despite the fact that risks exist in the higher education system and can never be eliminated, administration and staff of the Ukrainian universities are unaware of the nature of risk and the types of risks associated with their area of work. Although many studies have attempted to explore the risk management implementation in higher education, there is a sparse conceptual framework in this sphere. The author of this article focuses on the framework of categories and concepts, associated with the coverage of the issues of the risk management implementation in higher education institutions on the basis of such theoretical methods as a method of terminological analysis, comparison, synthesis, generalization. The comparative analysis of such key definitions as «risk», «risk management», «risk profile», «risk owner» is made on the basis of native and foreign scientific sources, definition and specialized dictionaries, the UK regulatory documents in the risk management sphere. It has been revealed that the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) defines risk as «the threat or possibility that an action or event will adversely or beneficially affect an organization’s ability to achieve its objectives». Risk management is characterized by it as «a process which can provide assurance that damaging things will not happen or are less likely to happen; that beneficial things will be or are more likely to be achieved». The author has proposed her own definition of risk management in higher education which is as follows: it is a structured and coherent approach that combines strategy, processes, people, technologies and skills to identify, assess and control the uncertainties which may impact the university’s ability to achieve its objectives and mission to provide educational services. An attempt to clarify the common terminology of pedagogical riskology that will enhance the level of knowledge of staff and administration of higher education institutions is made. The further research should focus on the analysis of the leading concepts of risk management in the Ukrainian and foreign theory of education.
The process of higher education modernization gives rise to a great deal of risks the higher education institutions face. This risk management policy forms part of the internal control and corporate governance arrangements of the UK universities which try to follow and adopt best practice in the identification, evaluation and control of risks to ensure that, as far as is reasonably practical, risks are eliminated or reduced to an acceptable level. Despite the fact that risks exist in the higher education system and can never be eliminated, administration and staff of the Ukrainian universities are unaware of the nature of risk and the types of risks associated with their area of work. Although many studies have attempted to explore the risk management implementation in higher education, there is a sparse conceptual framework in this sphere. The author of this article focuses on the framework of categories and concepts, associated with the coverage of the issues of the risk management implementation in higher education institutions on the basis of such theoretical methods as a method of terminological analysis, comparison, synthesis, generalization. The comparative analysis of such key definitions as «risk», «risk management», «risk profile», «risk owner» is made on the basis of native and foreign scientific sources, definition and specialized dictionaries, the UK regulatory documents in the risk management sphere. It has been revealed that the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) defines risk as «the threat or possibility that an action or event will adversely or beneficially affect an organization’s ability to achieve its objectives». Risk management is characterized by it as «a process which can provide assurance that damaging things will not happen or are less likely to happen; that beneficial things will be or are more likely to be achieved». The author has proposed her own definition of risk management in higher education which is as follows: it is a structured and coherent approach that combines strategy, processes, people, technologies and skills to identify, assess and control the uncertainties which may impact the university’s ability to achieve its objectives and mission to provide educational services. An attempt to clarify the common terminology of pedagogical riskology that will enhance the level of knowledge of staff and administration of higher education institutions is made. The further research should focus on the analysis of the leading concepts of risk management in the Ukrainian and foreign theory of education.
Опис
Ключові слова
понятійно-термінологічний апарат, вища освіта, педагогічна ризикологія, ризик, ризик-менеджмент, управління ризиками, профіль ризику, власник ризику, conceptual framework, higher education, pedagogical riskology, risk, risk management, risk profile, risk owner
Бібліографічний опис
Клочкова, Т. І. Менеджмент ризиків у вищій освіті: характеристика понятійно-термінологічного апарату дослідження [Текст] / Т. І. Клочкова // Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології : науковий журнал / МОН України, Сумський держ. пед. ун-т ім. А. С. Макаренка ; [редкол.: А. А. Сбруєва, О. Є. Антонова, Дж. Бішоп та ін.]. – Суми : СумДПУ ім. А. С. Макаренка, 2014. – № 10 (44). – С. 30–38.