Перегляд за Автор "Klish Andrii Bohdanovych"

Зараз показуємо 1 - 2 з 2
  • Документ
    Historiography of Ukrainian-Turkish Relations in the Cultural and Educational Sphere: State and Prospects of Research
    (2026) Klish Andrii Bohdanovych; Кліш Андрій Богданович; Drevnitskyi Yurii Romanovych; Древніцький Юрій Романович
    The article provides a comprehensive historiographical analysis of the cultural and educational dimension of Ukrainian–Turkish relations from 1991 to 2025. The aim of the study is to systematize the scholarly contributions of Ukrainian and foreign researchers, identify the main stages, thematic dominants, and methodological approaches to the study of humanitarian cooperation between Ukraine and Turkey, and outline prospects for further research in this field. The methodological framework of the study is based on the principles of historicism, systematicity, and interdisciplinarity, as well as on historiographical analysis, problem-chronological, structural-functional, and comparative methods, which make it possible to examine cultural and educational processes within the broader context of international relations and public diplomacy. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the comprehensive synthesis and critical reassessment of the historiography of Ukrainian–Turkish cultural and educational relations throughout the entire period of Ukraine’s independence, taking into account the impact of Russian aggression and the transformation of the role of the Ukrainian diaspora in Turkey. For the first time, the institutional forms of humanitarian interaction–namely the activities of higher education institutions, cultural centers, diaspora organizations, and international institutions–are considered within a single analytical framework as components of Ukraine’s “soft power” strategy and public diplomacy. The conclusions substantiate that the current stage of historiography is characterized by a shift in focus from political and economic aspects to the study of practical mechanisms of cultural and educational cooperation, which play an increasingly important role in shaping Ukraine’s positive image in Turkey and countering information challenges. Emphasis is placed on the need for further interdisciplinary research, particularly the study of Turkish historiography, the regional dimension of cooperation, and the interaction between state and civic actors in the humanitarian sphere.
  • Документ
    The Newspaper «Dilo» as a Source for Studying the Parliamentary Activity of Andrii Kosa
    (2025) Кліш Андрій Богданович; Klish Andrii Bohdanovych; Zuliak Ivan Stepanovych; Зуляк Іван Степанович
    The purpose of the research is to analyze the Ukrainian daily newspaper Dilo as a source for researching the parliamentary activity of Andrii Kos – one of the leading Ukrainian deputies to the Imperial Council of Austria-Hungary at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. The focus is on identifying the role of the publication in informing the public about the activities of Ukrainian parliamentarians, particularly Kos, as well as reconstructing his political stance through journalistic, analytical, and stenographic materials.The research methodologyis grounded in the principles of historicism, narrative analysis, and source criticism. The primary source base consists of «Dilo» publications from 1897 to 1903, which recorded Kos’s speeches, parliamentary inquiries, commentaries, and interpretations of his work. The study employs content analysis of parliamentary materials and thematic classification of Kos’s statements regarding pressing social, national, and legal issues. Additional archival sources, memoirs, and historiographical literature are used to critically cross-reference the data.The scientific novelty.For the first time in Ukrainian historiography, Dilo is analyzed as a coherent and systematic body of sources for reconstructing the political portrait of a specific Ukrainian parliamentarian within the Austro-Hungarian legislative system. The study identifies the specifics of how information was presented in the newspaper, the editorial board’s ideological stance on Kos’s key political initiatives, and the role of the press as an instrument for shaping public opinion and political culture in Halychyna.Conclusions. The «Dilo» newspaper emerges not only as a source of factual information but also as an active participant in the political process – a voice of the national-democratic wing of the Ukrainian movement in Austria-Hungary. Its publications allow for the reconstruction of both the substantive aspects of Andrii Kos’s parliamentary activity and the mechanisms of political communication between the deputy and the electorate. The analysis highlights key themes of his work, such as the defense of the Ukrainian language in the judiciary, criticism of fiscal policies affecting the peasantry, opposition to censorship, and advocacy against the feudal-era propinacja system. In public discourse, Andrii Kos appears both as a representative of socially marginalized groups and as an advocate for broader national emancipation of Ukrainians within the multiethnic empire. The results of this study may be useful for further research on the role of the press as a source of political history, as well as in developing topics related to the history of parliamentarianism and national representation of Ukrainians in the 19th and 20thcenturies.