Перегляд за Автор "Kedun Ivan"
Зараз показуємо 1 - 2 з 2
Результатів на сторінці
Налаштування сортування
Документ Engagement District as Part of the Early Rus Novgorod-Siversky Position(2023) Kedun Ivan; Кедун ІванThe article is dedicated to the part of the Novgorod-Siversky post that was located beyond the Zubrytsky stream. The purpose of the work is to determine the above-mentioned territory as a part of the post of the Old Russian city, although to this day there is no consensus on whether the studied territory belongs to the post of the city of Novgorod-Siverskyi. The most popular is its interpretation as a country estate that belonged to a wealthy Novgorodian from the north. The methodological basis of the research is based on the verification of previous versions with the materials of the latest archaeological research. The scientific novelty of the study is that a number of materials are published for the first time and fundamentally change the view on the system of positions in the ancient Russian city of Novgorod-Siverskyi. Excavations and mining of the surrounding area in recent years showed the spread of the ancient Russian cultural layer on an area of about 10 hectares, and reached the same area in his work O. Polyakov. In fact, the territory of Zaruchavya is adjacent to the post from the West. We believe that it was part of it, formed in the 12th century. To date, there is no consensus on whether the studied territory belongs to the city of Novgorod-Siverskyi. The most popular is its interpretation as a country estate that belonged to a wealthy Novgorodian from the north. However, the results of recent studies allow us to look at the problem in a new way. Further excavations and dredging of the surrounding area showed the spread of the ancient Russian cultural layer on an area of about 10 hectares, and O.M. Polyakov reached the same area in his work. In fact, the territory of Zaruchavya is adjacent to the post from the West. We believe that it was part of it, formed in the 12th century. Also, the cemetery discovered on the territory of Zaruchavye deserves special attention. Conclusions. The betrothal area was a part of the open post of Novgorod-Siverskyi, which was actively exploited in the 11th-13th centuries. It is also likely that the city cemetery was located on its territory. The time of the cemetery’s origin requires further research, however, today it can be attributed to the period after the Mongol invasion, since materials dated no later than the 14th century were found in the backfill of the graves. However, further research can significantly adjust the chronology.Документ Novgorod-Siversky in the 13th – 18th Centuries: Analysis of Archaeological Research on the Topic(2025) Kedun Ivan; Кедун ІванThe article is devoted to the analysis of the archaeological materials available today on the history of Novgorod-Siversky in the 13th – 17th centuries. Based on the comparison of written sources and the results of recent archaeological research, a new perspective on the current state of archaeological research on the topic is proposed. As a result of the study, the fact is stated that archaeological materials allow us to take a new look at the settlement and functioning of the city in the corresponding period. The aim of the work is to determine the state of archaeological research of the period from the 13th to the 17th centuries, the city of Novgorod-Siversky. The methodological basis of the study is based on the analysis and verification of previous scientific conclusions with the materials of recent archaeological research. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that on the basis of recent archaeological materials, promising directions, periods and tasks for further research are determined in the work. Conclusions. Archaeological research materials indicate the continuation of life in the city after the Mongol invasion, however, further research should reveal the issues of the functioning of fortifications, the number and nature of the population and the economy. Materials from the 14th – 16th centuries, although occasionally encountered during excavations, do not currently represent the surviving complexes and do not provide an opportunity to fully illustrate this period of the city’s life. Instead, the 17th century is widely covered both in written sources and in archaeologically illustrated series of complexes. Future research should be devoted to an attempt to link the mentioned periods stratigraphically and significantly expand knowledge about the 14th – 16th centuries.