Перегляд за Автор "Danylyuk Serhiy Semenovych"

Зараз показуємо 1 - 2 з 2
  • Документ
    The Use of Digital Tools in Teaching a Foreign Language to Future Professionals in Information and Educational Technologies
    (Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2025) Danylyuk Serhiy Semenovych; Данилюк Сергій Семенович
    This study offers a deep analysis of the use of digital tools in teaching foreign languages to students majoring in information and educational technologies. The research covers both the theoretical base and practical uses of platforms like Google Classroom Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Kahoot for blended and fully online learning environments. Conducted as a qualitative practitioner inquiry over three academic semesters, the study monitors how these digital tools affect learner engagement, motivation, language competence, and digital literacy development. It will pinpoint to what extent blended learning models can support effective learner autonomy with individualized pacing and real-world communication skills. The current article also touches on major obstacles–digital inequality, unstable Internet access, and inadequate technical support–and highlights an important continuing need for systematic teacher training so that digital tools are utilized not just efficiently but also meaningfully from a pedagogical perspective. Results indicate that gamified learning through Kahoot improves the retention of vocabulary, lowers learner anxiety, and increases participation. It underlines how important it is to align instructional goals with what technology allows. Without this alignment, there is the risk that digital tools might be used in a superficial way or rather ineffectively. This article concludes by making practical recommendations for educators who are willing to create meaningful language learning experiences supported by technology. The insights below will help learners as future professionals succeed in meeting the demands of digital communication and autonomous lifelong learning. Further research should take place exploring how blended learning models can be adapted from one discipline to another, along with different institutional settings.
  • Документ
    Typology of English Electronic Texts of Linguists’ Personal Web Pages
    (Видавничий дім «Гельветика», 2024) Danylyuk Serhiy Semenovych; Данилюк Сергій Семенович
    The typology of English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages is suggested in the paper. This typology was built taking into account a number of the following criteria: 1) according to the addresser orientation; 2) according to the functioning in various spheres of communication; 3) according to the type of presentation; 4) according to the primary/secondary source of information; 5) according to the pragmatic orientation. Within each criterion, appropriate types of English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages are distinguished. According to the addresser orientation, there are collective and individual English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages. On the other hand, English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages are scientific and information-and- reference texts based on their functioning in various spheres of communication. Consequently, according to the type of presentation, English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages are divided into narrative texts, reflection texts, and definition texts. In their turn, according to the primary/secondary source of information, English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages can be both primary and secondary texts. Finally, according to the pragmatic orientation, English electronic texts of linguists’ personal web pages are divided into texts aimed at informing, texts aimed at ascertaining and polemical-and-hypothetical texts. It is noted that the texts aimed at ascertaining are represented by such subtypes as texts stating the theoretical propositions of the scientific research and texts stating the results of experiments. Accordingly, polemical-and-hypothetical texts are divided into hypothetical and discussive-and-polemical texts.