Консенсус
Постійне посилання зібрання
Переглянути
Перегляд Консенсус за Автор "Borzov Sergey"
Зараз показуємо 1 - 2 з 2
Результатів на сторінці
Налаштування сортування
Документ The Concept of “Terror by Famine” by Robert Conquest in the Historiography of the Holodomor(2023) Borzov Sergey; Борзов СергійThe purpose of the study is to identify the historical origin of the term “terror by famine”, its synonymous evolution, conceptual and categorical design and use by R. Conquest in covering the causal circumstances of the Holodomor, as well as the scientific authorship of the term. The methodology consists of basic principles of research (historicism, objectivity), specific scientific and historical methods (problem-chronological, critical analysis of sources, comparative, retrospective). A systematic approach is a combination of the principle of historicism and a comprehensive analysis of historiographical sources to determine the role and place of the concept of “terror by famine” in the study of the causes, circumstances and consequences of the Holodomor. Scientific novelty is determined by the author’s formulation of the problem, i.e. for the first time the concept and phenomenon of “terror by famine”, which the American scientist used in his works, became the subject of in-depth historiographical study. Conclusions. It has been scientifically proven that the linguistic and historical semantic combination of the terms “terror” and “famine” originated in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Their first interpreters distinguished Stalin’s political repression (classical terror) from famine terror as a method of governing society. This interpretation is recorded in the works of M. Mishchenko and D. Solovei. The circumstances of the spread of other terminology, which covered the causes and consequences of the Holodomor (“artificial”, “organized”, “Great Famine”, “hunger strike”), were also established. The political and emotional components of these terms contributed to their faster assimilation in historiography and memorial practices in the West, especially among the Ukrainian Diaspora. A study of the works of R. Conquest showed not an abstract combination of the words “terror” and “hunger”, but dialectical. He abandoned the terms of interpretation of the Holodomor common in historiography and political science, even the very term of the “Holodomor”, and chose his own. His choice was not a coincidence, but a logical continuation of a systematic study of Soviet state terror in the 1930’s. The political scientist Conquest followed the principles of the theory of totalitarianism, so he wrote the famous book “The Great Terror”, the historian Conquest substantiated and implemented the concept of “terror by famine” in the monograph “Harvest of Sorrow”. We have a complete combination of theory and history.Документ The Concept of “Terror by Famine” by Robert Conquest in the Historiography of the Holodomor(2023) Borzov Sergey; Борзов СергійThe purpose of the study is to identify the historical origin of the term “terror by famine”, its synonymous evolution, conceptual and categorical design and use by R. Conquest in covering the causal circumstances of the Holodomor, as well as the scientific authorship of the term. The methodology consists of basic principles of research (historicism, objectivity), specific scientific and historical methods (problem-chronological, critical analysis of sources, comparative, retrospective). A systematic approach is a combination of the principle of historicism and a comprehensive analysis of historiographical sources to determine the role and place of the concept of “terror by famine” in the study of the causes, circumstances and consequences of the Holodomor. Scientific novelty is determined by the author’s formulation of the problem, i.e. for the first time the concept and phenomenon of “terror by famine”, which the American scientist used in his works, became the subject of in-depth historiographical study. Conclusions. It has been scientifically proven that the linguistic and historical semantic combination of the terms “terror” and “famine” originated in the late 1940s and early 1950s. Their first interpreters distinguished Stalin’s political repression (classical terror) from famine terror as a method of governing society. This interpretation is recorded in the works of M. Mishchenko and D. Solovei. The circumstances of the spread of other terminology, which covered the causes and consequences of the Holodomor (“artificial”, “organized”, “Great Famine”, “hunger strike”), were also established. The political and emotional components of these terms contributed to their faster assimilation in historiography and memorial practices in the West, especially among the Ukrainian Diaspora. A study of the works of R. Conquest showed not an abstract combination of the words “terror” and “hunger”, but dialectical. He abandoned the terms of interpretation of the Holodomor common in historiography and political science, even the very term of the “Holodomor”, and chose his own. His choice was not a coincidence, but a logical continuation of a systematic study of Soviet state terror in the 1930’s. The political scientist Conquest followed the principles of the theory of totalitarianism, so he wrote the famous book “The Great Terror”, the historian Conquest substantiated and implemented the concept of “terror by famine” in the monograph “Harvest of Sorrow”. We have a complete combination of theory and history.