Перегляд за Автор "Chuchalin Oleksandr"
Зараз показуємо 1 - 2 з 2
Результатів на сторінці
Налаштування сортування
Документ Educational Institutions at Kyiv Eparchy Monasteries Between the 19th аnd Early 20th centuries(2024) Chuchalin Oleksandr; Чучалін ОлександрThe article explores the establishment and activities of educational institutions within Kyiv eparchy monasteries from the second half of the 19thcentury to the early 20thcentury. A detailed analysis of relevant sources shows that this period marked the peak of activity for various monastic educational institutions, which emerged as significant socio-cultural centres for the Orthodox Church in Ukraine.The article aims to investigate educational activities of Kyiv eparchy monasteries from the second half of the 19thcentury to the early 20thcentury, focusing on the establishment and activities of various types of educational institutions associated with them. The research is methodologically grounded in the principles of scientific rigour and historicism, using general scientific methods of empirical and theoretical investigation. It allows for a specific historical approach to understanding educational activities of Kyiv eparchy monasteries during the designated period.The scientific novelty of this research lies in its first-ever analysis and systematization of information about educational activities of Kyiv eparchy monasteries, drawing on both archival and published sources. The research delves into the efforts to establish and organize various types of educational institutions affiliated with these monasteries, as well as examines the social composition of the student body.Conclusions. The research into the problem in question reveals that within the Kyiv eparchy from the late 19th to the early 20thcenturies, various educational institutions were established: parish schools, parish schools with craft and needlework departments, literacy schools, church-teacher schools and theological colleges. These institutions were primarily funded by the monasteries themselves, while tuition fees were only charged to children from prosperous families. Most students came from orphanages or impoverished backgrounds. The educational facilities were housed in both newly constructed buildings and monastery spaces adapted for educational purposes, complete with dining facilities and student accommodations. Alongside academic instruction, these monastic educational institutions offered well-structured vocational training.Документ Organization of the Orthodox Monasteries’ Management of the Russian Orthodox Church in the 18th – at the Beginning of the 20th Century(2023) Chuchalin Oleksandr; Чучалін ОлександрThe article analyzes the organization of administrative management of Orthodox monasteries of the Russian Orthodox Church during the synodal period. The information was systematized and the components of the multi-stage management system of the Orthodox monasteries of the Russian Orthodox Church in the 18th – early 20th centuries were established. In the 18th century the main legislative body of power in relation to the church became the Holy Synod, headed by a secular person – the arch-procurator. It was found out that Orthodox monasteries were an integral part of the system of institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church. The interaction of monasteries with state institutions on issues of state support is shown. The description of the methods of control of the diocesan authority over the monastery is given. It has been found that the management system of the Russian Orthodox Church in the synodal period was built on the principles of a combination of secular and ecclesiastical power. The spiritual consistory under the leadership of the ruling bishop became the central dominant in the regulationand settlement of the main range of problems arising in monastic life. All Orthodox monasteries of this period were not of the same type. They differed by many classification features – gender, states, status, classes, location. Monasteries in the dioceses were divided into three classes with the establishment of the norm of states of monks and nuns, who were in different status. The internal routine of monastic life was strictly regulated. It included the implementation of the monastery’s charter and orders of the abbot.